ontological$55124$ - definizione. Che cos'è ontological$55124$
Diclib.com
Dizionario ChatGPT
Inserisci una parola o una frase in qualsiasi lingua 👆
Lingua:

Traduzione e analisi delle parole tramite l'intelligenza artificiale ChatGPT

In questa pagina puoi ottenere un'analisi dettagliata di una parola o frase, prodotta utilizzando la migliore tecnologia di intelligenza artificiale fino ad oggi:

  • come viene usata la parola
  • frequenza di utilizzo
  • è usato più spesso nel discorso orale o scritto
  • opzioni di traduzione delle parole
  • esempi di utilizzo (varie frasi con traduzione)
  • etimologia

Cosa (chi) è ontological$55124$ - definizione

GÖDEL'S FORMALIZATION OF THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD USING MODAL LOGIC
Goedels ontological proof; Goedel's ontological proof; Godel's ontological proof; Godels ontological proof; Gödel ontological proof; Godel ontological proof; Goedel ontological proof; Gödel's ontological argument; Godel's ontological argument; Gödel's proof of the existence of God

Ontological turn         
2000S PHILOSOPHERS' AND ANTHROPOLOGISTS' INCREASED INTEREST IN ONTOLOGY
Ontological turn (anthropology)
The ontological turn is an increased interest in ontology within a number of philosophical and academic disciplines during the early 2000s. The ontological turn in anthropology is not concerned with anthropological notions of culture, epistemology, nor world views.
Gödel's ontological proof         
Gödel's ontological proof is a formal argument by the mathematician Kurt Gödel (1906–1978) for the existence of God. The argument is in a line of development that goes back to Anselm of Canterbury (1033–1109).
Ontological argument         
  • Alvin Plantinga criticized Malcolm's and Hartshorne's ontological arguments and proposed a variation of his own.
  • [[Anselm of Canterbury]] was the first to attempt an ontological argument for God's existence.
  • David Hume reasoned that an ontological argument was not possible.
  • French thinker René Descartes proposed several arguments that could be termed ontological.
  • German philosopher Gottfried Leibniz attempted to prove the coherence of a "supremely perfect being".
  • Immanuel Kant proposed that existence is not a predicate.
PHILOSOPHICAL ARGUMENT TO PROVE THE EXISTENCE OF GOD
TheOntologicalArgument; The ontological argument; Ontological Argument; Ontological proof; Ontological argument for the existence of God; Ontological Proof; Anselm's Argument; Ontological Arguments; Onthological argument; Proof by ontology; Anselm's argument; St Anselm's Argument; Ontological Argument for God; Ontological arguments for the existence of God
An ontological argument is a philosophical argument, made from an ontological basis, that is advanced in support of the existence of God. Such arguments tend to refer to the state of being or existing.

Wikipedia

Gödel's ontological proof

Gödel's ontological proof is a formal argument by the mathematician Kurt Gödel (1906–1978) for the existence of God. The argument is in a line of development that goes back to Anselm of Canterbury (1033–1109). St. Anselm's ontological argument, in its most succinct form, is as follows: "God, by definition, is that for which no greater can be conceived. God exists in the understanding. If God exists in the understanding, we could imagine Him to be greater by existing in reality. Therefore, God must exist." A more elaborate version was given by Gottfried Leibniz (1646–1716); this is the version that Gödel studied and attempted to clarify with his ontological argument.

Gödel left a fourteen-point outline of his philosophical beliefs in his papers. Points relevant to the ontological proof include:

4. There are other worlds and rational beings of a different and higher kind.
5. The world in which we live is not the only one in which we shall live or have lived.
13. There is a scientific (exact) philosophy and theology, which deals with concepts of the highest abstractness; and this is also most highly fruitful for science.
14. Religions are, for the most part, bad—but religion is not.